Tag: Featured Articles

To finance government activities and provisions of public goods and services like healthcare, education, infrastructure, defense, and social welfare programs, public funds are used. These funds are usually managed by government entities and are subject to firm rules and oversight to ensure that they are used in most appropriate manner. Good governance, specifically with respect to public funds, discusses the principles and practices that ensure resources are managed appropriately, clearly, and in the best of public interest. Generally, good governance includes the following key principles: 

Good governance depends on the efficient and transparent management of public funds. Financial audits and oversight mechanisms have become increasingly important as public trust is closely tied to financial accountability. These audits and mechanisms have two main purposes: detecting and preventing corruption and mismanagement, as well as promoting transparency and strengthening institutions to deliver tangible benefits to citizens.

Over the past 20–25 years, strategic management has been widely accepted as one of the methods for modernizing public policy. The Strategic Plan of the Chamber of Accounts for 2021–2025, which outlines the Chamber’s long-term development, reflects its vision, mission, core values, outcomes and outputs, and relevant activities. It was developed based on international expert evaluations and recommendations, progressive practices, the “Strategic Management Handbook for Supreme Audit Institutions,” and the principles of INTOSAI P-12 (The Value and Benefits of SAIs – Making a Difference to the Lives of Citizens). The Strategic Plan serves as a roadmap for the Chamber of Accounts’ operations from 2021 to 2025. It aims to strengthen institutional capacity and enhance the role of high-quality auditing in public financial management and oversight, through greater engagement with the parliament, government, and society.

The Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia (BPK) is constitutionally mandated as an independent body, reflecting the INTOSAI Lima Declaration (1977), which underscores the importance of legal, organizational, and operational independence in ensuring accountability. However, Indonesia’s evolving political and institutional landscape introduces challenges to this mandate. The 2024 presidential transition initiated a new development cycle under Law No. 25/2004, requiring each administration to prepare a National Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJMN) aligned with the Long-Term Development Plan (RPJPN). This process has involved ministerial restructuring, the establishment of new agencies, and the launch of flagship initiatives, such as the free nutritious meal program, all of which reshape governance arrangements and audit priorities.

Effective financial oversight is foundational to good governance. The Supreme State Audit Institution of Albania (KLSH) plays a vital role in safeguarding public resources, promoting accountability, and reinforcing trust in public institutions. This article shares key findings from the institution’s 2023 audit activities, assesses their impact on public sector governance, and identifies best practices applicable across INTOSAI member SAIs.

In the context of Myanmar’s ongoing political, economic, social, and administrative reforms, public expectations are increasing regarding the effective use of citizen-owned resources and the sound public financial management by the government.

Public sector accounting in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia is undergoing significant transformation, shifting from cash-based to full-accrual accounting. This shift represents a strategic pillar of Vision 2030, which includes large-scale capital projects. In light of this transformation, financial audits must evolve into proactive tools that identify risks, and help redirect public resources toward citizens’ priorities, rather than solely being passive year-end exercises. In response to these changes, Saudi Arabia’s General Court of Audit (GCA) has taken on an increasingly strategic role in strengthening financial oversight and public accountability. 

This study presents a practical application of Benford’s Law to the expenditure data of two Greek municipalities, Messini and Trifylia, aiming to evaluate the extent to which these financial transactions conform to the expected digit distributions as defined by Benford’s Law. The primary goal is to assess the utility of Benford’s Law as a tool in public sector auditing processes and determine whether it can raise red flags to prompt further investigative procedures.

Audit institutions serve as guardians of transparency and accountability in various societies around the world. Yet for too long, their work has remained cloaked in dense language, legal references, and technical jargon that are largely inaccessible to the general public. While audit reports contain findings that can impact every citizen—from public transportation delays to failures in health systems—most people never read them. In an age where information is expected to be instantaneous, visual, and emotionally resonant, audit institutions around the world must reimagine how they present their work.

Governments at a global level, can create various financial structures to segregate funds, set aside funds for specific objectives and manage funds on behalf of other parties. These structures can take the form of various types of trusts, funds, and special-purpose accounts.  Although they provide alternative financing mechanisms that are advantageous in certain circumstances, they can also present challenges from an accounting and auditing perspective.

Financial statement disclosure is considered an important aspect of enhancing transparency and accountability, thus combating corruption. Financial audits conducted by Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs) play an effective role in auditing these disclosures. In this article, we shall be tackling the disclosure audit of segments reports in the public sector, presenting a case study on these disclosures as an important aspect of enhancing transparency and accountability.

While financial audits of public expenditures are a cornerstone of government accountability, a critical dimension of public finance often escapes equivalent scrutiny: revenue losses through tax expenditures. In 2023–2024, Brazil’s Supreme Audit Institution (SAI Brazil), conducted an audit of federal tax benefits which revealed significant governance gaps and risks to fiscal sustainability.

The term “Supreme Audit Institution (SAI) independence” is defined as the ability to accomplish tasks objectively and effectively and to be protected against outside influence. Such independence, or a necessary degree of independence, shall be laid down in the Constitution, details may be set out in legislation, and an independence audit mandate shall be guaranteed (Lima Declaration 1977). Organizational independence refers to financial, managerial, and administrative autonomy (The Mexico Declaration, 2007). It is achieved through the application of key principles, various means, and safeguards that promote accountability and ensure transparency.

As the independence of SAIs is the cornerstone of their ability to safeguard public resources, promote transparency, and strengthen trust in government, it is widely accepted in the international audit sphere that without institutional, financial and operational autonomy, audit findings and recommendations risk being influenced, underestimated, or ignored, undermining accountability. As such, through frameworks as the Lima and Mexico Declarations, it has been consistently affirmed that independent SAIs are essential pillars of democratic governance. Yet, independence is not a fixed state as it requires protection and adaption to dynamic realities.

Mozambique’s supreme audit institution (SAI) continues to operate under a hybrid model inherited from the colonial epoch, resembling the jurisdictional model. Mozambique’s Administrative Court (Tribunal Administrativo, TA) consolidates three distinct courts within a single organization, represented by its respective chambers. The First and Second Chambers are focused on Administrative, and Tax and Customs litigation, respectively. The Third Chamber performs the functions of an SAI. Despite a visible and steady process of institutional development in recent years, the main obstacle to its progress has been its hybrid structure. This configuration hinders the institution’s organizational, financial, and functional independence, the foundational basis for the effective functioning of an SAI as recognized in the 1977 Lima Declaration. Consequently, there is no fully functional SAI in Mozambique that meets the recommendations of the United Nations (UN), INTOSAI, and international best practices.

The independence of Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs) is an essential element to ensure the effectiveness of auditing. It ensures that audit results are objective, credible, and free from external influence. Independence reinforces public confidence in the audit process and strengthens accountability mechanisms in government. Although, when auditing sensitive government entities, such as national security agencies, SAI independence can encounter significant challenges.

Independence is not merely a theoretical principle in the governance of state financial audit institutions, but rather an absolute requirement for the realization of credible public accountability. Independence is the primary foundation of INTOSAI-P10. INTOSAI-P10 emphasizes that the Indonesian Audit Board can only be objective and effective if it is independent from the audited entity and protected from external influences. Public trust is the greatest asset for any state institution. This trust is born from one fundamental key: independence, namely the freedom to work objectively, honestly, and free from pressure from any party. The independence of the BPK is the primary foundation for audit results to be recognized, trusted, and have a real impact on improving state financial governance. 

Created in 1990, the Territorial Chamber of Accounts of French Polynesia has been based in Papeete (Tahiti) since 2000. Since then, as a supreme audit institution (SAI), it has carried out its judicial and audit functions. With a total staff of 13, including six magistrates, it contributes to informing citizens and improving local public management.

SAI Belize is not a fully independent institution. While its legal mandate allows for audits to be carried out as deemed necessary, the Office is dependent on respective line ministries for the hiring of staff and approval of budget. In March 2025, I was appointed  as the new Auditor General, and have dedicated the first six months of my term to carry out awareness sessions with different stakeholders to introduce the conversation of why SAI Belize should enhance its independence. 

The issue of the independence of Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs) is back in the spotlight, more than ever before, in the context of complex and intertwined geopolitical, economic and environmental changes and crises. At a time when there is an urgent need for independent and effective oversight institutions, particularly given the steady increase in public spending and the growth of public debt, coupled with limited revenue growth, these institutions are facing pressures that undermine their independence and negatively affect their ability to perform their mandated roles. These pressures have taken various forms, such as budget cuts or failure to provide sufficient resources to carry out their work, interference in their programs and results, and in some cases the dismissal of officials or delays in their appointment

The independence of Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs) is widely recognized as a cornerstone of effective public oversight. The Lima Declaration¹ (INTOSAI P-1) emphasized that SAIs “can only accomplish their tasks objectively and effectively if they are independent of the audited entity and protected against outside influence.” Building on this principle, the Tribunal de Contas do Estado de Goiás (TCE-GO), Brazil’s state-level Court of Accounts, has invested in transforming the fundamental principles of ISSAIs into concrete operational routines. This effort has aimed not only at raising methodological quality but also at safeguarding independence in practice, ensuring that oversight activities remain resistant to political, economic, and institutional pressures.