By: Teguh Widodo

The independence of Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs) has long been recognized as a fundamental principle for ensuring the credibility and effectiveness of public sector auditing. Since the adoption of the Lima Declaration in 1977, the global consensus has been clear mentioning SAIs cannot fulfill their oversight mandate effectively without a high degree of independence, both formally guaranteed and practically exercised. Independence serves not only a technical function but also carries normative significance, as it underpins the accountability of governments to citizens and contributes to the broader goal of strengthening institutions as articulated in the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, particularly Goal 16 on peace, justice, and strong institutions.

The integrity and ethics standards and guidelines of supreme audit institutions (SAIs) have been provided by the International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions (ISSAI). INTOSAI P1 on the Lima Declaration states that members and auditors of a SAI must have the qualifications and moral integrity required to carry out their duties. ISSAI 100 on Fundamental Principles of Public Sector Auditing states that SAIs need to develop and maintain procedures relevant to organizational ethics and quality control to ensure that the supreme audit institution and its auditors comply with standards, ethics and statutory provisions. Furthermore, ISSAI 130 on the Code of Ethics emphasizes the need for a SAI to implement an ethics control system that comprises specific strategies, policies, and procedures. These practical elements, such as regular ethics training, clear ethical guidelines, and a system for reporting ethical violations, are crucial to guide, manage, and control ethical behaviour, making the implementation of ethics control systems a tangible and effective process. 

Striving for a high standard of ethical assurance has been deeply rooted as part of daily services in public institutions. Globally, INTOSAI has ISSAI 130 on the Code of Ethics, which underlines the importance of implementing an ethics control system within the SAI. The system does not only carry out ethical requirements but also other programs, such as risk identification, analysis, mitigation, educational support, assessment of misconduct allegations, and suspect protection. SAIs worldwide vie to initiate a satisfactory management climate and proactively ensure the expected morality. Invariably, SAI Indonesia believes in honouring these values.